Saturday, April 10, 2010

Why do people keep underestimating Far C ...

One of the best looking games out there. Yet, people keep saying that Gears 2 and stuff looks better...Some pics I took.  . Why do people keep underestimating Far C ...
farcry 2 looks amazing and has the best fire ever and few games have physics anywhere near as good.  crysis is about the only game that is technically better.   I guess people don't prase it because its multiplat so there is no ownage to be hadWhy do people keep underestimating Far C ...
It just feels really really blurry.
Cause the gameplay is terrible. Online was nothing short of rushed crap and the single player is repetitive and boring.
[QUOTE=''Wasdie'']It just feels really really blurry.[/QUOTE] Yeah I agree. There's a specific blurriness to the game. Maybe a certain kind of fliter? Also, when you run with your character he/she looses focus EVERYTIME! Sometimes it's overkill...Other than that is looks great. I'm playing the 360 version though and it doesn't really compare to other console graphics like I though it would. The PC version is of course noticeably better :P.But I wish the MP was better. It's understandable that it's not feature packed as other offerings since the map editor took alot of time for Ubi. I work on my maps almost everyday :).
It does look quite good, some of my own:
[QUOTE=''FantasySports02'']Cause the gameplay is terrible. Online was nothing short of rushed crap and the single player is repetitive and boring.[/QUOTE]

Not terrible. The mission system is repetitive at times, but I like it alot.



For MP... you have to take into account that Ubi offered an amazing Map Editor for all versions. That takes alot of work and I commend them. The editor is really fantastic.
Its multiplatform. People can make excuses, but we all know thats the only reason why it isn't argued. /thread. 
Farcry 2 looks absolutely amazing on played on Max settings on the PC. None of that blurring that many you claim it has, it's probably just on the 360 version.
[QUOTE=''Blue-Sky'']Its multiplatform. People can make excuses, but we all know thats the only reason why it isn't argued. /thread.  [/QUOTE]Yeah. It pretty much comes down to this. 
FC2 looks good, but the gameplay got very tiring quite quickly
I found that it being sandbox worked against it.Agree on the gfx.
[QUOTE=''Prospector'']Farcry 2 looks absolutely amazing on played on Max settings on the PC. None of that blurring that many you claim it has, it's probably just on the 360 version.[/QUOTE]i dont see the big deal with the visuals tbh, im running it on ultra with full aa and it seems a bit meh. i dont like the pallette, the colours look grubby. dont like the holding the gun and driving view, looks pretty cheap especially when compared to crysis, the only game that i think looks ''absolutely amazing.'' each to his own i guess.. :)
people are disappointed.rather than underestimating the game.people even used to hype this game so much saying this is their most anticipated shooter of the year. :?
[QUOTE=''Prospector'']Farcry 2 looks absolutely amazing on played on Max settings on the PC. None of that blurring that many you claim it has, it's probably just on the 360 version.[/QUOTE]It still looks very inferior to Crysis. The graphics are cartoony looking and the gameplay is repetetive. All it is is a bunch of average looking foilage and blocky buildings. And the dynamic faction based gameplay was overhyped and then gimped.
[QUOTE=''joopyme'']people are disappointed.rather than underestimating the game.people even used to hype this game so much saying this is their most anticipated shooter of the year. :? [/QUOTE]



no prone or lean functions make this game feel like console ####



lol i just relized your the guy who thinks fo3 has better gunplay than halo
[QUOTE=''BudsMcGreen''][QUOTE=''Prospector'']Farcry 2 looks absolutely amazing on played on Max settings on the PC. None of that blurring that many you claim it has, it's probably just on the 360 version.[/QUOTE]It still looks very inferior to Crysis. The graphics are cartoony looking and the gameplay is repetetive. All it is is a bunch of average looking foilage and blocky buildings. And the dynamic faction based gameplay was overhyped and then gimped. [/QUOTE] only 20% done and it bored me to death
It looks great no doubt, I enjoyed playing with the map editor but i'm playing the PS3 version which run at only 720p, i'm assuming the 360 version looks sharper for that reason on 1080p
[QUOTE=''BIOWAREISKING''][QUOTE=''joopyme'']people are disappointed.rather than underestimating the game.people even used to hype this game so much saying this is their most anticipated shooter of the year. :? [/QUOTE]



no prone or lean functions make this game feel like console ####



lol i just relized your the guy who thinks fo3 has better gunplay than halo[/QUOTE]

i still do. :?
[QUOTE=''Blue-Sky'']Its multiplatform. People can make excuses, but we all know thats the only reason why it isn't argued. /thread.  [/QUOTE]Yep. That's the only reason I can figure for why it's never brought up. Even the 360 version of Far Cry 2 is one of the best looking games I've ever seen. I'd love to see it running on max settings on a PC.

No comments:

Post a Comment