Notice how I put the quotes on ''Real'', I'll say this once again: Brawl Deseved the score it got. Brawl has a single player, and so does Left 4 Dead, but anyone buying either title for any reason other than the multiplayer is kind of missing the point of both games. I'm sorry if you feel like I'm attacking Brawl or the Wii System in general, since that was not my intention. It was to only draw comparisons. My point is alot of people here don't think so, and did not think so before it's release and were blindsided. I may not of compensated the standards between the systems, but I feel safe in saying that this game could get a 9.5 here. If Super Smash Brothers can get a 9.5; S ...
No.If Super Smash Brothers can get a 9.5; S ...
It deserves a 10. It is as fun as goldeneye (which is one of the most fun games that I have every played) And if goldeneye can get a 9.8 this game can get a 10
[QUOTE=''angry_fork'']No.[/QUOTE]With the amount of polish this game has, I'd say it has a very good chance at a 9, probably a 9.5.
Care to explain why? Smash Brothers got the 9.5 over ''real'' games like Gears or Resistance 2. The sheep may be gone, but they still have one of the highest rated exclusives this year, with the exception of Metal Gear of course :D Smash Brothers didn't need a convoluted story, a 10 hour campaign, or Spectacular Graphics. The Game was fun, and every aspect of it was polished to perfection and has mass replayability. Thats exactly how I would describe Left 4 Dead.
[QUOTE=''Jodan77'']Care to explain why? Smash Brothers got the 9.5 over ''real'' games like Gears or Resistance 2. The sheep may be gone, but they still have one of the highest rated exclusives this year, witht the exception of Metal Gear of course :D Smash Brothers didn't need a convoluted story, a 10 hour campaign, or Spectacular Graphics. The Game was fun, and every aspect of it was polished to perfection and has mass replayability. Thats exactly how I would describe Left 4 Dead. [/QUOTE] Well, actually Brawl did have somewhat of story, didnt make much sense but it was there.
SSE was 8 hours long.I thought the graphics in Brawl were very nice and great.
[QUOTE=''Jodan77'']Super Smash Brothers is one of the funnest party games out there, which lacked a significant single player mode.Left 4 Dead is the best Cooperative Game Out There, which lacks a significant multiplayer mode. [/QUOTE]Do I need to point out what's wrong with that statement?
I haven't had as much fun simply moving down baddies since Jedi Outcast, and Doom before that, but it will be interesting to see how GS rates a game that is just plain fun. Does it have a story? No, but it wouldn't really benefit from one (it would actually bog down the multiplayer aspect), so should it matter?.
Does it have single player? Yes, as much as a game like Super Smash Brothers has bots to fight against, so should it matter?
Is is short? Not really, replaying the same level plays out differently each time, so should the linear level length matter?Does it offer a massive, wholeistic package that includes a deep single player campaign, storyline, and the usual multiplayer (deathmatch, CTF)? No, but if it's amazingly fun, should that matter?
[QUOTE=''C-Lee''] Well, actually Brawl did have somewhat of story, didnt make much sense but it was there.
SSE was 8 hours long. I thought the graphics in Brawl were very nice and great.
[/QUOTE] The Graphics were great, for the Wii. The Graphics for Left 4 Dead are Great, considering it's running on the source engine, and it looks beautiful in motion. Graphic Whores will disagree. Brawl had a lackluster story, but it was there. Left 4 Dead has atmosphere; it can be both hilarious and frightening when you make it to a saferoom and see that someone has etched the words on the wall ''You'll Never Survive'' or ''they're Bombing the City! GET OUT!''. The simple act of walking past a body covered under a bed sheet is revealing; someone had to of covered up their friend's deceased corpse. ---[QUOTE=''SemiMaster''][QUOTE=''Jodan77'']Super Smash Brothers is one of the funnest party games out there, which lacked a significant single player mode.Left 4 Dead is the best Cooperative Game Out There, which lacks a significant multiplayer mode. [/QUOTE]Do I need to point out what's wrong with that statement? [/QUOTE] LOL! Don't know how I overlooked that. Edited.
This smells like damage control when this game flops.
if super smash brothers can get a 9.5, then anything can get 9.5
I don't care if the game flops or not, I just want the damn review to come up. It'll be fun to see hundreds of comments saying ''Gamespot has no Credibility!'' or ''Overrated!'' respectively. And it would be damage control if I hated the game, but I think Super Smash brothers deserved the score it got, unlike most people here.
Different standards, man.
SSBB has a story, along with hrs of content to unlock,good gameplay, and online. THe only thing I see Left4dead having is the long hrs of gameplay with friends.
Okay first off, your evaluation of Brawl is flawed. It had a story mode so saying it lacked single player is wrong. What exactly about it makes it not a ''real game''? Lemme guess, because it's a Wii title? There's also a number of reasons why L4D might not score as high. First off it's a shooter (which means it has no real comparison to Brawl, leaving me to question the value of this thread). Second, since it is a shooter it's a part of an already crowded genre making it harder for it to stand it. Hell, CoD just got an 8.5 this year so I wouldn't play the ''since Brawl got a 9.5 so can L4D''.
Different Genre.Different Standards.
[QUOTE=''Lionheart08'']Okay first off, your evaluation of Brawl is flawed. It had a story mode so saying it lacked single player is wrong. What exactly about it makes it not a ''real game''? Lemme guess, because it's a Wii title? There's also a number of reasons why L4D might not score as high. First off it's a shooter (which means it has no real comparison to Brawl, leaving me to question the value of this thread). Second, since it is a shooter it's a part of an already crowded genre making it harder for it to stand it. Hell, CoD just got an 8.5 this year so I wouldn't play the ''since Brawl got a 9.5 so can L4D''.[/QUOTE] EDIT:Notice how I put the quotes on ''Real'', I'll say this once again: Brawl Deseved the score it got. Brawl has a single player, and so does Left 4 Dead, but anyone buying either title for any reason other than the multiplayer is kind of missing the point of both games. My point is alot of people here don't think so, and did not think so before it's release and were blindsided. I may not of compensated the standards between the systems, but I feel safe in saying that this game could get a 9.5 here.
comparing a fighter with a shooter nice job!
I'm sorry, but that game looks like the Average shooter with a sub par story. I looked at videos and screens, the graphics are crap compared to something like gears or even resistance too, and then people act like the premise is so unique and big, wow... Zombies, big whoop. The features sound great on paper, but how many games were boasted for features and got bad scores? Sorry, when I get my 360 I WILL NOT, be picking this up.
lol, its gonna get 9 here tops. If it cant get above a 9 on ign, theres no way its going to at lowspot. decent chance of floppage based on gamespots recent track record if you ask me. that is, of course, assuming they release a review.
No comments:
Post a Comment