Question...What PC tower is needed to get same grap ...
all of those setups destroy consoles. you can equal a consoles graphics with like a 7800gtx, 1gig ram and the lowest end c2d.What PC tower is needed to get same grap ...
[QUOTE=''blues3531'']all of those setups destroy consoles. you can equal a consoles graphics with like a 7800gtx, 1gig ram and the lowest end c2d.[/QUOTE]Pretty much.
try a 7900 GT 1GB of ram and a pentium 4
The first two destroy consoles. This poll is awful.
Any of those easily does. 256MB 7800, 1GB RAM, and a low end dual core prettymuch matches the consoles graphically. At least PS3 has a unique and powerful CPU for the future though.
[QUOTE=''rimnet00'']The first two destroy consoles. This poll is awful.[/QUOTE]Youre right i forgot to mention with the graphics improvement of console games and demanding ports in mind...
The first 2 destroy consoles.....The last one is what you need to equal console graphics...
[QUOTE=''Heydanbud92'']try a 7900 GT 1GB of ram and a pentium 4[/QUOTE]Yeah like 7900GS, 7900GT, X1900GT, X1950PRO. But I'd prefer a AMD 64 over a crappy P4. ;)
Since the consoles in general runs on lower resolution is it preatty easy to match.A X1950PRO is today a $100 card.
But I'd rather get a cheap core 2 duo (overclock it), 2GB RAM and a 8800GT. That would crush any of the consoles and to a nice price.
[QUOTE=''-AK47-'']The first 2 destroy consoles.....The last one is what you need to equal console graphics...[/QUOTE]Joke post?That PC has 2GB of RAM. and a x1950xtx, It's far superior to any console.
LOL You don't really need much to out class, let alone match, the Playstation 3 and Xbox 360.
People seems to think that both the 360 and the PS3 are performance monsters. But to run a PC game at the same resolution and with the same graphical detail isn't that demanding.
Let me see most games on the console dont even run at 720p and have week AA.... So I guess:- AMDx2 Athlon 3800+- 1 GB 677Mhz RAM- X1950proA PC would those specs cheap case, hard drive, mother baord will set you back ?00 -?00... so you wouldn't pay much more than a PS3 or an Elite.... kinda makes the PC's expensive arguement look stupid.
All of those gpu's destroy consoles, a 1900xt is about as close as you can get.
[QUOTE=''blues3531'']all of those setups destroy consoles. you can equal a consoles graphics with like a 7800gtx, 1gig ram and the lowest end c2d.[/QUOTE]yeah, true
Console render at 1280*720 (hell, MANY games lower res then that). Crysis can be run on high with a X1950XT at that res.
[QUOTE=''blues3531'']all of those setups destroy consoles. you can equal a consoles graphics with like a 7800gtx, 1gig ram and the lowest end c2d.[/QUOTE]your first mistake is thinking there the same. For example GOW2 on ps2 couldn't be done on an equivalent PC and later on in this generation consoles you can expect too see the same trend.
It should reallybe between the 1950XT and the 8800GT..Its closer too 1950XT though..
That is a loaded question. You could have bumped an old thread, because this is exactly like the rest.
[QUOTE=''Cali3350'']Console render at 1280*720 (hell, MANY games lower res then that). Crysis can be run on high with a X1950XT at that res.[/QUOTE]Crysis can be run at high with that res with the GTX at a good framerate (40 or so).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment