Playstation 3 vs Xbox 360

I will explain the two sides of the consoles then you can give your views as to which you prefer and what you would rather buy and why. The PS3 has a dedicated processor which was espically made for the purpose of processing game data fast and making the console responsive, it also as a powerful graphics card to fuel the high-end gaming however this is bottlenecked by the weaker CPU.The Xbox 360 has similar specifications however the graphics card different to the way the PS3 performs to more useage is spread on the graphics card which enables the games to develop much faster.  Playstation 3 vs Xbox 360
No, both have weak hardware. My PC PWNs them both to the ground, but I still prefer the consoles to my PC :DSo see their specs don't matter Playstation 3 vs Xbox 360
tecnically both are similar but 360 is easyer to develop for. so, imo 360 wins
Simply put the ps3 has the technical edge while ease of programming have given the 360 the edge up to about now where they're pretty equal.What really makes the difference for me is that the 360 is LOUD!
Yeah, this posts screams of being objective....Seriously, what is with all these new accounts that start flame-bait threads as of late? 
They're both powerful but unreliable and plagued with problems which is a real shame.
How innovative
[QUOTE=''PAL360'']tecnically both are similar but 360 is easyer to develop for. so, imo 360 wins[/QUOTE]Wrong! PS3 has nearly a .2% fail rate compared to the 360s 35% fail rate, PS3 plays Bluray discs and 360 doesn't, PS3 has free online play 360 charges you. PS3 = 9.8/10 360 = 8.5/10.
[QUOTE=''OnlineBug''] I will explain the two sides of the consoles then you can give your views as to which you prefer and what you would rather buy and why. The PS3 has a dedicated processor which was espically made for the purpose of processing game data fast and making the console responsive, it also as a powerful graphics card to fuel the high-end gaming.The Xbox 360 has similar specifications however the graphics card is bottlenecked by the processor which effects performance. [/QUOTE]You got it the wrong way around, ps3's cpu is bottlenecked by it's bandwidth and gpu, plus it's hard to develop for. 360 is easy to develop for and it's gpu and cpu are well in synch with each other.
[QUOTE=''patriots7672''][QUOTE=''PAL360'']tecnically both are similar but 360 is easyer to develop for. so, imo 360 wins[/QUOTE]Wrong! PS3 has nearly a .2% fail rate compared to the 360s 35% fail rate, PS3 plays Bluray discs and 360 doesn't, PS3 has free online play 360 charges you. PS3 = 9.8/10 360 = 8.5/10. [/QUOTE]Where the hell did you get 35%? Last i heard it was 15% and that was in May. And don't call the 360 and PS3 ''high-end'', because they aren't. High end means QuadCore and GeForce 9.
[QUOTE=''OnlineBug'']I will explain the two sides of the consoles then you can give your views as to which you prefer and what you would rather buy and why. The PS3 has a dedicated processor which was espically made for the purpose of processing game data fast and making the console responsive, it also as a powerful graphics card to fuel the high-end gaming.The Xbox 360 has similar specifications however the graphics card is bottlenecked by the processor which effects performance. [/QUOTE]Wrong.The 360 has a more powerful Graphics card. FactThe 360 was designed to share 512mb ram across the GPU/system. The PS3 was designed to split it 50/50 (although in a bind it can share it, but at slight hit to bandwidth) Fact.The CPU in the 360 is closer to a traditional CPU in PC's. The Cell although crunches numbers faster, is not as well suited to gaming applications. Fact.  
You can have all the technical features you want in a console and it can be the easiest console to develop for... but absolute NO.1 it has to be a reliable piece of equipment. And the 360 definitely isn't that! You can say what you want... ''oh it's better now, it's only 15% fail rate blah blah''. But the fact is, that's still unacceptably bad!Plus PS3 is a fantastic console. It has Blu-ray, free PSN, great games line-up, and it's reliable!So IMO, PS3 wins...
[QUOTE=''patriots7672''][QUOTE=''PAL360'']tecnically both are similar but 360 is easyer to develop for. so, imo 360 wins[/QUOTE]Wrong! PS3 has nearly a .2% fail rate compared to the 360s 35% fail rate, PS3 plays Bluray discs and 360 doesn't, PS3 has free online play 360 charges you. PS3 = 9.8/10 360 = 8.5/10. [/QUOTE]

Yeah, and ones white and the other is black.
[QUOTE=''hrt_rulz01'']You can have all the technical features you want in a console and it can be the easiest console to develop for... but absolute NO.1 it has to be a reliable piece of equipment. And the 360 definitely isn't that! You can say what you want... ''oh it's better now, it's only 15% fail rate blah blah''. But the fact is, that's still unacceptably bad!Plus PS3 is a fantastic console. It has Blu-ray, free PSN, great games line-up, and it's reliable!So IMO, PS3 wins...[/QUOTE]Well IMO if the 360 has the better hardware, online system, games, performance, but breaks down more often then it's 4-1 and I'm sticking with the 360 
[QUOTE=''kerpal_cz''][QUOTE=''hrt_rulz01''] You can have all the technical features you want in a console and it can be the easiest console to develop for... but absolute NO.1 it has to be a reliable piece of equipment. And the 360 definitely isn't that! You can say what you want... ''oh it's better now, it's only 15% fail rate blah blah''. But the fact is, that's still unacceptably bad!Plus PS3 is a fantastic console. It has Blu-ray, free PSN, great games line-up, and it's reliable!So IMO, PS3 wins...[/QUOTE]Well IMO if the 360 has the better hardware, online system, games, performance, but breaks down more often then it's 4-1 and I'm sticking with the 360 [/QUOTE] Every person is going to have a different view on which console is better. Some say that 360 has better hardware, others say PS3 does. Some will like the 360's games lineup, other PS3s. But personally, I think the 360 failure rate is just unacceptable! I know it killed my liking of the Xbox brand. Hopefully it will be reserected next gen.
[QUOTE=''kerpal_cz''][QUOTE=''hrt_rulz01''] You can have all the technical features you want in a console and it can be the easiest console to develop for... but absolute NO.1 it has to be a reliable piece of equipment. And the 360 definitely isn't that! You can say what you want... ''oh it's better now, it's only 15% fail rate blah blah''. But the fact is, that's still unacceptably bad!Plus PS3 is a fantastic console. It has Blu-ray, free PSN, great games line-up, and it's reliable!So IMO, PS3 wins...[/QUOTE]Well IMO if the 360 has the better hardware, online system, games, performance, but breaks down more often then it's 4-1 and I'm sticking with the 360 [/QUOTE] what is this ''better hardware'' you speak off ?
both consoles, power wise, are pretty much the same.game wise, now it is a matter of opinion.reliability wise, the ps3 wins easily.I got a ps3 because my 360 died of the rrod and i was not prepared to invest in broken hardware. 
[QUOTE=''micky4889'']what is this ''better hardware'' you speak off ?[/QUOTE] The CPU/GFX card. The things in the Xbox that run games in actual 720 rather than the scaled up stuff the PS3 is forced to do.  
[QUOTE=''kerpal_cz''][QUOTE=''micky4889'']what is this ''better hardware'' you speak off ?[/QUOTE] The CPU/GFX card. The things in the Xbox that run games in actual 720 rather than the scaled up stuff the PS3 is forced to do.  [/QUOTE] Ummm... the vast majority of games run at 720 on both the 360 and the ps3. however, the ps3 has more 1080 games than the 360. and the 360 hardware is trash. fun whilst it lasts trash, but still trash.
I vote for pcs.     :D